The Hendricksons are Here!

The Hendricksons are Here!

Yes, the Hendricksons are on the Farmington River. In fact they started showing up in the Collinsville stretch about 10 days ago.  Then two cold days last week shut the hatch down. So weather has been a factor. It always is. And timing the hatch hasn’t been easy. Sometime it came off at 1:30 pm and ended by 3pm. Other days it didn’t start until 3pm? And get this. Oddly enough, on Monday myself and many others didn’t fish because of sustained 2o mph winds. Turned out that was the day of the most intense hatch so far. Go figure.

Male Hendrickson Dun on the Farmington River

Yesterday, in the first pool we tried, no signs of the hatch? Damn. Same thing happened to me on Tuesday. So took a gamble and went much farther upstream. Farther then we thought the hatch had likely progressed. Paid off. The duns came off about 2:40 pm in the head of the pool. Bingo I got my first trout of the year on a dry. Making it even more fun, I was using my Winston Retro Rod. Gotta love it.

Winston Retro Rod in Action

Caught a couple of fish, the biggest being a brown trout of near 15″. It slammed a Hendrickson ‘Comparadun” and put up quite a scrap on the “glass” 4wt.  Had my old Hardy princess singing a tune too. Unfortunately the hatch only last about 35 minutes. After that the action tapered right off. Oh well that’s fishing folks. As Mick Jagger said ” You can’t always get what you want.”  More Hendrickson hatch here. The Klinkhammer here And more hatch info. 

Winston Retro Rod with Trout

Posted in Flies and Fly Tying, Fly Fishing in Freshwater | Leave a comment

The “Eighty-Eight”, a Forgotten Fly

The “Eighty-Eight”, a Forgotten Fly

See newer link https://edmitchelloutdoors.com/2024/10/24/a-forgotten-fly/

A while back, I was looking though Paul Schmookler’s massive tome Forgotten Flies. Wow, what a fascinating book. There I came across a picture of a streamer fly I first learned of while fishing a fairly remote spot in northern New England. With me at the time was a professional guide who knew the waters well. We were focused on landlock salmon, at the time. So naturally I asked him what he felt would be the best fly. He relied an “88”.

The Eighty-Eight, a Forgotten Fly

An “88”? Damn, I told him I had no idea what that was! He smiled, opened his fly box and hand me a small, slim, flat wing streamer.  The body was made of red and green copper wire. The wing was a mallard flank feather. Not much else to it really, but it immediately proved its worth, catching several landlocks. Since then I always carry a couple “88”s

Schmookler’s book offers no details, instead referring readers to Dick Steward & Bob Leeman’s book Trolling Flies for Trout and Salmon. There you will find the following dressing. Thread– brown; Body – 2/3 red wire- 1/3 green wire; Wing– lemon wood duck flank tied flat on top; Collar -a few turns of soft grizzle hackle; Comment– Considered a casting fly for brook trout, often tied with red and green floss instead of wire.  

Red & Green Wire Body

Steward & Leeman make no mention of the fly’s origin or creator. Hoping to find out more, in the intervening years I asked quite a few anglers, including some professional fly tyers, if they had heard of the “88”. The answer has always been – a resounding “no”. In fact I have never being able to discover anything more about this forgotten fly. It is not in Eric Leiser’s Book of Fly Patterns nor is it in Colonel Bates big book Streamers and Bucktails. Know anything?  

Ready for the Wing

I tie it mainly on a size 8# Mustad 9575 streamer hook. A fine choice for most any streamer.  Yeah, I’m no exhibition tyer so I don’t always stick to the recipe. My thread choice is red to start, switching to black for the head.  Don’t have any red and green copper wire? There are a slew of other materials you could substitute. Under the wing I may add a few strands of  pearl flash and a small touch of white bucktail. (see above) But I never add the collar. Still at times I do get fancy – coat the wire with clear acrylic, spray the wing with fixative, maybe add decal eyes.  None of that is really necessary. I fish it as I was shown years ago – short strips with pauses. It works, believe me. A small sleek streamer can be deadly.  

 

Posted in Flies and Fly Tying, Fly Fishing in Freshwater | Leave a comment

A Winston Retro Rod: Part Two

A Winston Retro Rod: Part Two

Retro on the Left, Vintage on the Right

Ready to fling some fly line? Let’s cast the 8’, 3-piece, 4wt Retro rod. The line aboard will be a Cortland 444, DTF 4 with a 10-foot leader. Unfortunately, I do not have a vintage Winston 4wt for comparison. But I do have my vintage Winston 8’, 3-piece, 6wt, which has a Cortland DTF 5wt and a 10-foot leader. Perhaps it will still supply some insight.

Okay let’s start short. The Retro rod formed a nice loop with just 3-feet of fly line. Ummm. An evening “spinner” fall can have trout sipping at your feet. Clearly the Retro is ready. Gradually I worked out more line. There was no visible shock wave unless I pushed the rod. From 20-30 feet, the rod is very smooth. With some extra effort, I reached 35’, but in my opinion this is the practical limit of this rod. Add the leader and that is a 45’ reach. Plenty. Although Tom Morgan no longer worked for Winston when this rod was made, it is just what Tom Morgan would have asked for.

As you would expect the vintage 8′, 6wt is not exactly the same as the Retro 4wt. It is good at short range but not the equal of the 4wt. No surprise there. Each cast bears a tiny shock wave: totally acceptable. From 20-30 feet, like the 4wt, this rod is in its full glory, but it easily launched 48’ of line. Nice. The old war horse still has some juice!

Obviously, the Retro rod was not built on blanks identical to the Winston blanks of the past. Those rods came to a screeching halt when Fisher could no longer get the correct phenolic resin. Still Winston has done a fine joy of replicating the feel and casting performance of yesteryear. You gotta love it. Tip of the hat to Winston.

Posted in Fiberglass Fly Rods, Fly Rods, Gear | Leave a comment

A Winston Retro Rod: Part One

A Winston Retro Rod: Part One

Lets look at  another Winston fiberglass fly rod. This time around its a 8′, 3 piece, 4wt Winston Retro Rod. The rod, seen below, was given to me by Winston around twenty years ago. (I believe in response to an 1998 magazine article I had written entitled Retro Rod.) Sadly these Retro rods were not a commercial success and only available for a few years. If you’re a fiberglass aficionado, however, I highly recommend you search for one of these 4wts. The fit and finish is excellent, as you might expect.  And it is a superb companion on small to medium rivers. You’ll love this rod. I certainly do. So lets take a closer look at these special, and now rare, fly rods . In the next post we’ll cast it. 

Winston Retro Rod 8′, 3piece, 4wt

Back then, the Winston catalogue stated:  “The Retros are as close as we can come to the reproducing the 73-75 fiberglass rods from Winston’s San Francisco shop.” As you may know those wands are world famous and highly collectible. So how did Winston do with this reincarnation? In terms of appearance, they pretty much nailed it. (We’ll deal with casting in the next post.) The blanks are nearly the same color. (The older rods are a touch darker.) The wraps are the same Gudebrod red, tipped in clear.  The “Trophy Cup” badge is alive and well. White spigot ferrules return. The old and new rod bags are similar, both sporting the attractive green & gold woven label. Yes, there are obviously updates. The Retro rod wears a modern stripping guide, replacing the original carbaloy one. And the rod tube is nicer that the vintage one.

Like the  original Winston Stalker series, the Retro rods were offered in only 3wt or 4wt. Unlike the Stalker series which had 9 models, the Retro rod had only 8, but included some very short rods down to 5′. Stalkers came as 2 piece rods. (Back in the 1970’s, a 3 or 4 piece rod cost  an additional $2.50) The Retros were mainly 3 piece. All of them were listed as having “slow” action. While vintage Winston Stalkers were called slow or medium depending on the model. Back in the early 70’s the Stalkers commanded the princely sum of $65. By the end of the 70’s they were up to $90. The Retros were priced at $525. Lordy how times change.

The Retro Winston offered me was serial number 1#, with a down-locking reel seat, and a wood insert. Since the original Stalkers came with a slide band real seat, however, I felt that was more accurate and would also noticeably lower the rod’s weight. Winston kindly made the change for me, but the serial number was no longer 1#.  Before I forget let me mention that the original Winston 8′ 4wt was called the “The Tom Morgan Favorite”.  Okay Here’s Part Two

Interested in reading about other Winston Fiberglass  fly rods?  Check out these links. Winston 2wt Stalker, Winston 5wt , Winston 6wt, Winston 8wt, Winston 1owt, Winston 12wt

 

Posted in Fiberglass Fly Rods, Fly Rods | 6 Comments

The Hendricksons are Coming

The Hendricksons are Coming

Spring is the time of year when what is arguably the best dry fly action of the season is set to come off. I’m referring to Ephemerella subvaria, the mighty Hendricksons. Like all hatches on freestone rivers, the Hendrickson hatch is a bit difficult to precisely nail down. In his book Trout Flies and Flowers, Ivan Mahoney connects the hatch with appearance of violets in the spring. Yet I have heard other people connect it to forsythia. (See 2021 Update here)

In their 1975 book Hatches, Al Caucci & Bob Nastasi say that in the mid-Atlantic states the hatch occurs as early as the first week of April. Farther north into Southern New England, they report the hatch is typically delayed until the final weeks of April or even the opening days of May. North of there, the hatch can go well into May or even early June. This varied schedule is attributed to differences in water temperatures. Caucci & Nastasi write that the required temperature is between 50-55 degrees.  Adding that the hatch usually occurs in early afternoon until as late as 6pm.   

Lady Beaverkill Spinner

A Little Dry Fly History: The well known Hendrickson dry fly was created in 1916 by Catskill tier Roy Steenrod, who had studied tying with Theodore Gordon. Roy named the fly after his angling buddy Albert E. Hendrickson. Many years later Art Flick developed his famous Ephemerella subvaria dry fly – the Red Quill. (He borrowed the name from an old English fly) Flick felt his fly was a better imitation of the male Ephemerella subvaria, and Steenrod’s fly a better match for the female. During the hatch, Art believed one riffle might have only males duns and the next riffle downstream only females. For that reason he urged anglers to carry both patterns. By the way Ephemerella subvaria is the only mayfly with a distinct male and female. Note a popular fly called the Lady Beaverkill sporting a yellow egg sac just forward of the tail. The origin of this fly are murky, but some say DuBruce Blacksmith and George Cooper developed it around 1890. It is tied both as a dun and a spinner.

The Klinkhammer

The last fly I’ll mention is the Klinkhammer. This is a more recent fly originally created in the 1980’s for grayling. It is a unique dry fly in that the tail slopes underwater to represent a dun struggling to leave its nymph shuck. You might call it a dun/emerger.  Learn more here.  An excellent fly.   See Update here 

Posted in Flies and Fly Tying, Fly Fishing in Freshwater | 2 Comments